Final report: West Bloomfield High School, West Bloomfield, Mi
The most important thing we learned from this activity was not to take
things for granted! We studied dominant and recessive traits as part of
our lessons on genetics. But we did not probe deep enough in the analysis
of the data to actually apply what we learned. For example, we "heard"
that dominant traits tend to show up more frequently. Therefore, we asssumed
that free earlobes, white forelock, etc were dominant traits because most
people in the data showed these expressions. We even calculated ratios
of free:attached earlobes and got a 2.4:1 ratio. We expected a 3:1 ratio.
We were stumped and initially jumped to the conclusion that the data were
bad. But our teacher then told us which expressions were actually dominant
and recessive and asked us if we needed to re-define our terms dominant
and recessive! This stumped us at first. But after group discussion, we
decided that a dominant trait only shows up most often when the parental
genotypes are both hybrid. Since we did not know the parental genotypes
in this activity, we could not make conclusions on which expression was
dominant here. Then, we discussed natural selection in our study of evolution,
and decided that the expression of a trait that showed up most often was
probably the one that was most adaptive, not necessarily dominant! We learned
a good lesson. Analyzing this data, while time-consuming and sometimes
difficult, was still fun.
The Genetics Project is maintained with WebBBS 2.14.